I myself believe life begins at conceptions, however all these evil monsters that believe abortion is a human right have many stupid arguments as to why I would be wrong. These same people would be the first to call the police on you if you were to even accidentally step on a birds egg, claiming you had killed a baby bird.
Well, these monsters have grown a new set of horns over in the “great state” of California.
Let me present to you, Assembly Bill AB-2223 Reproductive health, Introduced by Assembly Member Wicks, Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Mullin.
The Bill opens with the following:
(1) Existing law requires a county coroner to hold inquests to inquire into and determine the circumstances, manner, and cause of violent, sudden, or unusual deaths, including deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion. Existing law requires a coroner to register a fetal death after 20 weeks of gestation, unless it is the result of a legal abortion. If a physician was not in attendance at the delivery of the fetus, existing law requires the fetal death to be handled as a death without medical attendance. Existing law requires the coroner to state on the certificate of fetal death the time of fetal death, the direct causes of the fetal death, and the conditions, if any, that gave rise to these causes. This bill would delete the requirement that a coroner hold inquests for deaths related to or following known or suspected self-induced or criminal abortion, and would delete the requirement that an unattended fetal death be handled as a death without medical attendance. The bill would prohibit using the coroner’s statements on the certificate of fetal death to establish, bring, or support a criminal prosecution or civil cause of damages against any person.
What is being said here is that no matter how happens, there should be no investigation of loss of life of your child, even if the cause of death is violent, sudden, or unusual.
(2) Existing law, the Reproductive Privacy Act, provides that every individual possesses a fundamental right of privacy with respect to their personal reproductive decisions. Existing law prohibits the state from interfering with a pregnant person’s right to choose or obtain an abortion before the fetus is viable or when it is necessary to protect the life and health of the pregnant person. Under existing law, an abortion is unauthorized if either the person performing the abortion is not a health care provider that is authorized to perform an abortion or the fetus is viable. This bill would prohibit a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome or based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person who is exercising their reproductive rights. The bill would clarify that an abortion is unauthorized if performed by a person other than the pregnant person and either the person performing the abortion is not a health care provider that is authorized to perform an abortion or the fetus is viable. The bill would authorize a party aggrieved by a violation of the Reproductive Privacy Act to bring a civil action against an offending state actor, as specified, and would require a court, upon a motion, to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff.
What they are saying here is that this bill would prohibit a person from being subject to civil or criminal liability of loss of life of your child, even if the cause of death is violent, sudden, or unusual.
Jump on down to SEC. 7. Section 123467
SEC. 7. Section 123467 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:
123467. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death. (b) A person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under this article shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise be deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under this article with the pregnant person’s voluntary consent.
Please notice the way they word it and include the term perinatal death. Why does this stand out, why did the feel the need to use such a term? ’Perinatal’ means the time from the start of your pregnancy up to roughly one year after giving birth. The word has two parts: peri meaning 'around' natal meaning 'birth'.
These evil, vile, disgusting, monsters are literally introducing the ability to kill your child even after birth, making it where no one can even question what happened.
Why am I not seeing outrage about this, why is this bill so hidden? Literally people can stat having babies just to murder them in cold blood in California, it will be completely legal.
THINK ABOUT IT
We must gather together and pray for the protection of all children, lord Jesus keep them safe.
”But we ourselves will go ready armed before the children of Israel, until we have brought them unto their place: and our little ones shall dwell in the fenced cities because of the inhabitants of the land.” Numbers 32:17 KJV
